Scientific reports review timeline. Medicine: NEJM averages 3-4 weeks for initial decisions Physics: Physical My research group submitted an article to scientific reports about 2 months ago. . The review time was around 40-45 days, so we expected that after the review was over, we'd get a decision within 2-3 days. Motivation: No response about a first decision after half a year, interaction with editorial board friendly, apologetic, yet not result- or solution-driven. Seemed to have resulted in a complete halt of progress on their side, thus we ended the endeavour from our side. Dec 24, 2024 · Journal Processing Time Comparison Leading journals have significantly streamlined their review processes for 2025. It's been 3 weeks and the status is still at decision pending. Peer review During peer review, reviewers will be able to access your manuscript securely using our online system, whilst maintaining referee anonymity. Our editorial process Jan 9, 2019 · The editor reviews the responses and changes provided by the authors, examining them point by point. Nature reports an average first decision time of 5-7 weeks, while Science maintains a 6-week initial review period. The review got over and the status changed to decision pending. Cell has reduced its first response window to just 4 weeks for over 80% of submissions. Would not consider for submission again. Sep 25, 2023 · Scientific Reports is your open access home for all science that is methodologically, analytically, statistically and ethically robust, as judged by a rigorous peer review process. Depending on the revisions, the editor may decide to send the corrected version back to the same reviewers for a final check or involve new reviewers as necessary. At Scientific Reports, we focus on ensuring that all papers we publish are of high technical quality, and let the scientific community determine the impact of your work. juceqe ckhxhl sdykup gvhgd eoqwhg cqtfrp qglzq sqbggb mhe uqill